4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Demulsification of Crude Oil-in-Water Emulsions Driven by Graphene Oxide Nanosheets

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 4644-4653

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00966

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51374195]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seeking highly efficient, rapid, universal, and low-cost demulsification materials to break up the crude/heavy oil-in-water emulsion and emulsified oily wastewater at ambient conditions has been the goal of the petroleum industry. In this work, an amphiphilic material, graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets, Was introduced as a versatile demulsifier to break up the oil-in-water emulsion at room temperature. It was encouraging to find that the small oil droplets in the emulsion quickly coalesced to form the oil phase and separated with the water within a few minutes. The demulsification tests indicated that the residual oil in separated water samples was as low as similar to 30 mg/L, corresponding to a demulsification efficiency over 99.9% at an optimum GO dosage. More importantly, GO not only is useful for ordinary crude oil emulsion but also can be used to break up the extra heavy oil emulsion. The effect of the emulsion pH on the demulsification was also investigated. It was interesting to find that the. distribution of GO either in oil or in water phase after demulsification was dependent on the pH value of the solution, which was attributed to the pH-dependent amphiphilicity of GO. The prominent demulsification ability of GO was attributed to the strong adsorption between the GO nanosheets and molecules of asphaltenes/resins driven by pi-pi interactions and/or n-pi interactions. The findings in this work indicate that the GO nanosheets are a simple, highly efficient, and universal demulsifier to separate the oil from the crude/heavy oil-in-water emulsions at ambient conditions, which shows a good application prospect in the oil industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据