4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Exosomes: novel regulators of bone remodelling and potential therapeutic agents for orthodontics

期刊

ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 95-99

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12165

关键词

extracellular vesicle; microvesicle; osteoblast; osteoclast; RANK

资金

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [R21 DE019862]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies suggest that exosomes are involved in intercellular communication required for the maintenance of healthy bone. Exosomes are small (30-150nm in diameter) extracellular vesicles that are formed in multivesicular bodies and are released from cells as the multivesicular bodies fuse with the plasma membrane. Regulatory exosomes have the capacity to exert profound control over target cells. They can stimulate plasma membrane receptors and are also internalized by the target cell delivering proteins, lipids, small molecules and functional RNAs from the cell of origin. We and others have recently reported on regulatory exosomes from osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Key candidate molecules identified in exosome-based regulation of bone remodelling include receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK), RANK-ligand (RANKL), ephrinA2, semaphorin 4D, microRNA-146a and microRNA- 214-3p. Exosomes will likely prove to be crucial elements in the communication networks integrating bone cells (osteoclasts, osteoblasts, osteocytes) and linking bone to other tissue. Exosomes collected from bone cells grown in culture may prove useful to augment bone remodelling associated with orthodontic force application or required for the repair of craniofacial bone. Various technologies allow exosomes to be engineered to improve their targeting and efficacy for therapeutic purposes. In summary, exosomes have emerged as important elements of the machinery for intercellular communication between bone cells. They hold great promise as therapeutic targets, biomarkers and therapeutic agents for orthodontists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据