4.5 Article

Leaf wax n-alkane extraction: An optimised procedure

期刊

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 283-292

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.08.012

关键词

n-Alkanes; Leaf wax; Accelerated solvent extraction; Ultrasound solvent extraction; Cladium Typha

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leaf wax n-alkanes are often extracted from modern plant material to describe their natural occurrence and understand the factors determining their potential as biomarkers for climate reconstruction. Despite several studies on the topic no standardised approach for n-alkane extraction from leaves has been yet devised. A common issue is the necessity to work on leaf subsamples to reduce co-extraction of unwanted polar compounds (e.g. chlorophyll), as they often interfere with individual steps involved in post-extraction, wet-chemical isolation of leaf wax n-alkanes. However, subsampling can generate biases regarding n-alkane distribution, concentration, and isotopic composition due to heterogeneities along the leaf sheath. Therefore, we propose and test an optimised extraction approach. Using leaves of Cladium mariscus and Typha angustifolia, we compared the effect on n-alkane extraction of two solvent mixtures, two extraction techniques and two sample preparation modalities. We found similar results for the two modes of sample preparation (intact vs. shredded leaf), while the use of the two solvent mixes and the two extraction techniques produced significantly different results. n-Hexane/dichloromethane 9: 1 was almost twice as efficient (+ 97%) than the more commonly used dichloromethane/methanol 9: 1, producing higher n-alkane yields while reducing co-elution of highly polar compounds. The best results, both for yield, sample processing time and solvent consumption, were achieved in combination with the accelerated solvent extraction technique, averagely + 49% more efficient than ultrasound assisted solvent extraction. Alongside, we investigated the distribution of n-alkanes along the leaf sheath of C. mariscus. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据