4.6 Article

Amphipathic guanidine-embedded glyoxamide-based peptidomimetics as novel antibacterial agents and biofilm disruptors

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 2033-2051

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ob00053g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Discovery Project from Australian Research Council [DP 140102195]
  2. University of New South Wales for a Tuition Fee Scholarship (TFS)
  3. Living Allowance Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria is becoming increasingly prevalent, posing a critical challenge to global health. Bacterial biofilm formation is a common resistance mechanism that reduces the effectiveness of antibiotics. Thus, the development of compounds that can disrupt bacterial biofilms is a potential strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance. We report herein the synthesis of amphipathic guanidine-embedded glyoxamide-based peptidomimetics via ring-opening reactions of N-naphthoylisatins with amines and amino acids. These compounds were investigated for their antibacterial activity by the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against S. aureus and E. coli. Compounds 35, 36, and 66 exhibited MIC values of 6, 8 and 10 mu g mL(-1) against S. aureus, respectively, while compounds 55 and 56 showed MIC values of 17 and 19 mu g mL-1 against E. coli, respectively. Biofilm disruption and inhibition activities were also evaluated against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The most active compound 65 exhibited the greatest disruption of established biofilms by 65% in S. aureus, 61% in P. aeruginosa, and 60% in S. marcescens respectively, at 250 mu M concentration, while compound 52 inhibited the formation of biofilms by 72% in S. marcescens at 250 mu M. We also report here the in vitro toxicity against MRC-5 human lung fibroblast cells. Finally, the pore forming capability of the three most potent compounds were tested using tethered bilayer lipid membrane (tBLM) technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据