4.1 Article

Randomized Trial of Desktop Humidifier for Dry Eye Relief in Computer Users

期刊

OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE
卷 94, 期 11, 页码 1052-1057

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001136

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SIGNIFICANCE: Dry eye is a frequently reported problem among computer users. Low relative humidity environments are recognized to exacerbate signs and symptoms of dry eye, yet are common in offices of computer operators. Desktop USB-powered humidifiers are available commercially, but their efficacy for dry eye relief has not been established. PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the potential for a desktop USB-powered humidifier to improve tear-film parameters, ocular surface characteristics, and subjective comfort of computer users. METHODS: Forty-four computer users were enrolled in a prospective, masked, randomized crossover study. On separate days, participants were randomized to 1 hour of continuous computer use, with and without exposure to a desktop humidifier. Lipid-layer grade, noninvasive tear-filmbreakup time, and tear meniscus height were measured before and after computer use. Following the 1-hour period, participants reported whether ocular comfort was greater, equal, or lesser than that at baseline. RESULTS: The desktop humidifier effected a relative difference in humidity between the two environments of +5.4 +/- 5.0% (P <.001). Participants demonstrated no significant differences in lipid-layer grade and tear meniscus height between the two environments (all P >.05). However, a relative increase in the median noninvasive tear film breakup time of +4.0 seconds was observed in the humidified environment ( P <.001), which was associated with a higher proportion of subjects reporting greater comfort relative to baseline (36% vs. 5%, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Even with a modest increase in relative humidity locally, the desktop humidifier shows potential to improve tear-film stability and subjective comfort during computer use. Copyright (C) 2017 American Academy of Optometry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据