4.6 Article

Sub-shot-noise shadow sensing with quantum correlations

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 25, 期 18, 页码 21826-21840

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.021826

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L016753/1, EP/M01326X/1]
  2. European Union's Horizon Research and Innovation Programme [706410]
  3. European Research Council (TWISTS) [340507]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M01326X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J000361/1, Gravitational Waves, ST/N005422/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [706410] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  7. EPSRC [EP/M01326X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. STFC [ST/J000361/1, Gravitational Waves, ST/N005422/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quantised nature of the electromagnetic field sets the classical limit to the sensitivity of position measurements. However, techniques based on the properties of quantum states can be exploited to accurately measure the relative displacement of a physical object beyond this classical limit. In this work, we use a simple scheme based on the split-detection of quantum correlations to measure the position of a shadow at the single-photon light level, with a precision that exceeds the shot-noise limit. This result is obtained by analysing the correlated signals of bi-photon pairs, created in parametric downconversion and detected by an electron multiplying CCD (EMCCD) camera employed as a split-detector. By comparing the measured statistics of spatially anticorrelated and uncorrelated photons we were able to observe a significant noise reduction corresponding to an improvement in position sensitivity of up to 17% (0.8dB). Our straightforward approach to sub-shot-noise position measurement is compatible with conventional shadow-sensing techniques based on the split-detection of light-fields, and yields an improvement that scales favourably with the detector's quantum efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据