4.6 Article

High-resolution spectroscopy of laser ablation plumes using laser-induced fluorescence

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 2312-2326

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.002312

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. DOE/NNSA Office of Nonproliferation and Verification Research and Development [NA22]
  2. U.S. DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute [DE-AC05-76RLO1830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy (LIF) of laser-produced plasmas under varying nitrogen pressure levels up to atmospheric pressure. The plasmas were generated on a glass target containing minor amounts of U and Al using 1064 nm, 6 ns pulses from a Nd: YAG laser. A frequency-doubled continuous- wave Ti: Sapphire laser was used as an ultra-narrowband tunable LIF excitation source to increase the magnitude and persistence of emission from selected U and Al atomic transitions in a laser-produced plasma. 2Dfluorescence spectroscopy (2D-FS) absorption/emission images were recorded at various nitrogen pressure levels, showing both excitation and emission spectral features. At lower pressure levels (100 Torr), fluorescence emission was found to be well separated in time from thermally-excited emission. However, as the ambient pressure increased, the thermally-excited emission persisted for longer times along with a reduction of LIF emission persistence and intensity. The excitation spectral features showed the inherent linewidths of various transitions in the plasma, which have significantly narrower spectral linewidths than observed in emission spectra. We evaluated two nearby transitions separated by only 18 pm to demonstrate the effectiveness of fluorescence spectra over thermally-excited spectra for high-resolution studies. The present results highlight the importance of LIF as a diagnostic tool employing continuous- wave laser re-excitation, addressing some of the limitations of traditional emission and absorption spectroscopic methods. (C) 2017 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据