4.7 Article

Screening of supported and unsupported Mn-Si oxygen carriers for CLOU (chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling)

期刊

ENERGY
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 544-554

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.017

关键词

CO2-capture; CLC (chemical-looping combustion); CLOU (chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling); Combined oxides oxygen carrier; Manganese-silicon oxides

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7)/ERC [291235]
  2. Swedish Energy Agency
  3. Preem AB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen carriers based on oxides of Mn and Si in combination with Mg, Al, Ca and Ti (Mn0.63Si0.27X0.1, X = Ca(OH)(2), TiO2, MgO, AIOOH were examined for CLOU (chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling), in terms of oxygen uncoupling ability and ability to convert both methane and syngas. The focus was on the optimization of the production process to yield mechanically strong oxygen carrier particles with a reasonable activity. For this purpose, 15 types of oxygen carriers were produced by spray-drying and calcined for different time periods and at different temperatures. The oxygen uncoupling behavior and gas conversion of the materials were investigated in a batch fluidized-bed reactor under alternating oxidizing and reducing conditions in the temperature range 850-1050 degrees C. To determine attrition resistance and mechanical stability, a jet-cup attrition rig was used. Furthermore, physical and chemical properties such as specific surface area and crystal phase composition have been determined. For the oxygen carriers with additives of Mg, Al, Ca, Ti, some material combinations showed a significant increase in reactivity and improved mechanical stability compared to the unsupported Mn-Si particles. Changing the production process (milling process and calcination time) just caused slight difference in attrition resistance, gas conversion as well as oxygen release. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据