Influence of Emission Spectrum and Irradiance on Light Curing of Resin-Based Composites

Purpose: This study examined the influence of different emission spectra ( single-peak and broad-spectrum) light-curing units (LCUs)delivering the same radiant exposures at irradiance values of 1200 or 3600 mW/cm(2) on the polymerization and light transmission of four resin-based composites (RBCs). Methods and Materials: Two prototype LCUs that used the same light tip, but were either a single-peak blue or a broad-spectrum LED, were used to deliver the same radiant exposures to the top surfaces of the RBCs using either standard (1200 mW/cm(2)) or high irradiance (3600 mW/cm(2)) settings. The emission spectrum and radiant power from the LCUs were measured with a laboratory-grade integrating sphere coupled to a spectrometer, and the light beam was assessed with a beam profiler camera. Four RBCs (Filtek Supreme Ultra A2, Tetric EvoCeram A2, Tetric EvoCeram T, and TPH Spectra High Viscosity A2) were photoactivated using four different light conditions: single-peak blue/standard irradiance, single-peak blue/high irradiance, broadspectrum/standard irradiance, and broadspectrum/high irradiance. The degree of conversion (N=5) and microhardness at the top and bottom of 2.3-mm-diameter by 2.5-mmthick specimens (N=5) were analyzed with analysis of variance and Tukey tests. The real-time light transmission through the RBCs was also measured. Results: For all light conditions, the 2.3-mmdiameter specimens received a homogeneous irradiance and spectral distribution. Although similar radiant exposures were delivered to the top surfaces of the RBCs, the amount of light energy emitted from the bottom surfaces was different among the four RBCs, and was also greater for the single-peak lights. Very little violet light ( wavelengths below 420 nm) reached the bottom of the 2.5-mm-thick specimens. The degree of conversion and microhardness results varied according to the RBC ( p < 0.05). The RBCs that included alternative photoinitiators had greater microhardness values at the top when cured with broad-spectrum lights, while at the bottom, where little violet light was observed, the results were equal or higher when they were photoactivated with single-peak blue lights. With the exception of the microhardness at the top of TPH, equivalent or higher microhardness and degree-of conversion values were achieved at the bottom surface when the standard ( 1200 mW/cm(2)) irradiance levels were used compared to when high irradiance levels were used. Conclusions: Considering the different behaviors of the tested RBCs, the emission spectrum and irradiance level influenced the polymerization of some RBCs. The RBCs that included alternative photoinitiators produced greater values at the top when cured with broadspectrum lights, while at the bottom, results were equal or higher for the RBCs photoactivated with single-peak blue lights.