4.5 Article

EVI5 is a novel independent prognostic predictor in hepatocellular carcinoma after radical hepatectomy

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 2251-2258

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5862

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; ecotropic viral integration site 5; biomarker; hepatectomy; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation in China [81460360, 81560403]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [2015211C126, 2016D01C374]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study explored the correlation of ecotropic viral integration site 5 (EVI5) expression with clinicopathological features and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 205 HCC patients were included retrospectively. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blotting were performed to detect the profile of EVI5 expression in HCC cell lines and fresh tissues. Archived paraffin-embedded specimens were investigated for EVI5 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Both the mRNA and protein levels of EVI5 were obviously upregulated in HCC cell lines and tumor tissues. EVI5 protein level was closely associated with the clinicopathological characteristics, including liver function (P=0.013), venous invasion (P=0.015) and TNM stage (P=0.014). Furthermore, univariate analysis showed that the patients with high EVI5 expression indicated shorter overall survival (OS, P<0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, P=0.001) than those with low EVI5 expression. Importantly, high EVI5 expression also exerts predictive power for higher postoperative recurrence rate by stratified analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that OS was correlated with both tumor number (P=0.046) and EVI5 expression (P<0.001) and that RFS was correlated with serum AFP (P=0.023), tumor number (P=0.036) and EVI5 expression (P<0.001). Taken together, EVI5 is an useful independent prognostic marker of survival and recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据