4.5 Article

Carotid plaque instability is not related to quantity but to elemental composition of calcification

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.05.006

关键词

Cardiovascular disease; Atherosclerosis; Plaque calcification; Hydroxyapatite; Energy dispersive; X-ray microanalysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: Recent studies highlighted the role of calcification processes in the clinical progression of chronic cardiovascular diseases. In this study we investigated the relationship between the chemical composition of calcification and atherosclerotic plaque stability in carotid arteries. Methods and results: To this end, we characterized the calcification on 229 carotid plaques, by morphology, immunohistochemistry, transmission electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis. Plaques were classified into two categories: unstable and stable. No significant differences were found in the incidence of the various risk factors between patients with and without carotid calcification, with the exception of diabetes. The energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis allowed us to identify two types of calcium salts in the atheromatous plaques, hydroxyapatite (HA) and calcium oxalate (CO). Our results showed that calcification is a common finding in carotid plaques, being present in 77.3% of cases, and the amount of calcium is not a factor of vulnerability. Noteworthy, we observed an association between HA calcification and unstable plaques. On the contrary, CO calcifications were mainly detected in stable plaques. Conclusions: The presence of different types of calcification in atheromatous plaques may open new perspectives in understanding the molecular mechanisms of atheroma formation and plaque instability. (C) 2017 The Italian Society of Diabetology, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition, and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据