4.8 Article

Exploring genetic associations with ceRNA regulation in the human genome

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 10, 页码 5653-5665

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx331

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Hong Kong
  2. Tianjin Medical University
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81400239]
  4. Research Grants Council, Hong Kong SAR, China [17121414M]
  5. Mayo Clinic Arizona
  6. Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine
  7. National Institute of Health [R01 GM113242-01, U41 HG7000, U01 CA180980]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) are RNA molecules that sequester shared microRNAs (miRNAs) thereby affecting the expression of other targets of the miRNAs. Whether genetic variants in ceRNA can affect its biological function and disease development is still an open question. Here we identified a large number of genetic variants that are associated with ceRNA's function using Geuvaids RNA-seq data for 462 individuals from the 1000 Genomes Project. We call these loci competing endogenous RNA expression quantitative trait loci or 'cerQTL', and found that a large number of them were unexplored in conventional eQTL mapping. We identified many cerQTLs that have undergone recent positive selection in different human populations, and showed that single nucleotide polymorphisms in gene 3' UTRs at the miRNA seed binding regions can simultaneously regulate gene expression changes in both cis and trans by the ceRNA mechanism. We also discovered that cerQTLs are significantly enriched in traits/diseases associated variants reported from genome- wide association studies in the miRNA binding sites, suggesting that disease susceptibilities could be attributed to ceRNA regulation. Further in vitro functional experiments demonstrated that a cerQTL rs11540855 can regulate ceRNA function. These results provide a comprehensive catalog of functional non-coding regulatory variants that may be responsible for ceRNA crosstalk at the post-transcriptional level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据