4.8 Article

Discovering the 3′ UTR-mediated regulation of alpha-synuclein

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx1048

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, 'Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa'
  2. CERCA Programme / Generalitat de Catalunya
  3. European Research Council [RIBOMYLOME_309545]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BFU2014-55054-P]
  5. Fundacio La Marato de TV3 [PI043296]
  6. European Research Council Fundacio la Marato de TV3 [RIBOMYLOME_309545, PI043296]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence indicates a link between Parkinson's Disease (PD) and the expression of a-synuclein (SNCA) isoforms with different 3' untranslated regions (3' UTRs). Yet, the post-transcriptional mechanisms regulating SNCA expression are unknown. Using a large-scale in vitro/in silico screening we identified RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that interact with SNCA 3' UTRs. We identified two RBPs, ELAVL1 and TIAR, that bind with high affinity to the most abundant and translationally active 3'UTR isoform (575 nt). Knockdown and overexpression experiments indicate that both ELAVL1 and TIAR positively regulate endogenous SNCA in vivo. The mechanism of regulation implies mRNA stabilization as well as enhancement of translation in the case of TIAR. We observed significant alteration of both TIAR and ELAVL1 expression in motor cortex of postmortem brain donors and primary cultured fibroblast from patients affected by PD and Multiple System Atrophy (MSA). Moreover, trans expression quantitative trait loci (trans-eQTLs) analysis revealed that a group of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TIAR genomic locus influences SNCA expression in two different brain areas, nucleus accumbens and hippocampus. Our study sheds light on the 3'UTR-mediated regulation of SNCA and its link with PD pathogenesis, thus opening up new avenues for in-vestigation of post-transcriptional mechanisms in neurodegeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据