4.6 Article

Quantifying the contribution of mass flow to nitrogen acquisition by an individual plant root

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 218, 期 1, 页码 119-130

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14927

关键词

diffusion; mass flow; nitrogen (N) immobilization; nitrogen uptake model; rhizosphere processes; root-microbe competition; root-nitrogen uptake; soil-nitrogen transport

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning
  2. Kempe Foundations
  3. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)
  4. Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (Vinnova)
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The classic model of nitrogen (N) flux into roots is as a Michaelis-Menten (MM) function of soil-N concentration at root surfaces. Furthermore, soil-N transport processes that determine soil-N concentration at root surfaces are seen as a bottleneck for plant nutrition. Yet, neither the MM relationship nor soil-N transport mechanisms are represented in current terrestrial biosphere models. Processes governing N supply to roots - diffusion, mass flow, N immobilization by soil microbes - are incorporated in a model of root-N uptake. We highlight a seldom considered interaction between these processes: nutrient traverses the rhizosphere more quickly in the presence of mass flow, reducing the probability of its immobilization before reaching the root surface. Root-N uptake is sensitive to the rate of mass flow for widely spaced roots with high N uptake capacity, but not for closely spaced roots or roots with low uptake capacity. The results point to a benefit of root switching from high- to low-affinity N transport systems in the presence of mass flow. Simulations indicate a strong impact of soil water uptake on N delivery to widely spaced roots through transpirationally driven mass flow. Furthermore, a given rate of N uptake per unit soil volume may be achieved by lower root biomass in the presence of mass flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据