4.8 Article

Effect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 377, 期 8, 页码 733-744

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611179

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [HHSN268200900040C, HHSN268200900046C, HHSN268200900047C, HHSN268200900048C, HHSN268200900049C, A-HL-13-002-001]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  4. National Institute on Aging
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  6. Clinical and Translational Science Awards - National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH [UL1TR000439, UL1RR025755, UL1RR024134, UL1TR000003, UL1RR025771, UL1TR000093, UL1RR025752, UL1TR000073, UL1TR001064, UL1TR000050, UL1 TR000005, 9U54TR000017-06, UL1TR000105-05, UL1 TR000445, UL1TR000075, UL1TR000002, UL1TR000064, UL1TR000433, P30GM103337]
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The previously published results of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial showed that among participants with hypertension and an increased cardiovascular risk, but without diabetes, the rates of cardiovascular events were lower among those who were assigned to a target systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) than among those who were assigned to a target of less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment). Whether such intensive treatment affected patient-reported outcomes was uncertain; those results from the trial are reported here. METHODS We randomly assigned 9361 participants with hypertension to a systolic blood-pressure target of less than 120 mm Hg or a target of less than 140 mm Hg. Patient-reported outcome measures included the scores on the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9), patient-reported satisfaction with their blood-pressure care and blood-pressure medications, and adherence to blood-pressure medications. We compared the scores in the intensive-treatment group with those in the standard-treatment group among all participants and among participants stratified according to physical and cognitive function. RESULTS Participants who received intensive treatment received an average of one additional antihypertensive medication, and the systolic blood pressure was 14.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 14.3 to 15.4) lower in the group that received intensive treatment than in the group that received standard treatment. Mean PCS, MCS, and PHQ-9 scores were relatively stable over a median of 3 years of follow-up, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups. No significant differences between the treatment groups were noted when participants were stratified according to baseline measures of physical or cognitive function. Satisfaction with blood-pressure care was high in both treatment groups, and we found no significant difference in adherence to blood-pressure medications. CONCLUSIONS Patient-reported outcomes among participants who received intensive treatment, which targeted a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, were similar to those among participants who received standard treatment, including among participants with decreased physical or cognitive function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据