4.2 Article

Effects of Duchenne muscular dystrophy on muscle stiffness and response to electrically-induced muscle contraction: A 12-month follow-up

期刊

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 214-220

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.01.001

关键词

Elastography; Ultrafast ultrasound; Evoked muscle force; Electromechanical delay; Myopathy

资金

  1. French Muscular Dystrophy Association (AFM) [18846]
  2. Region Pays de la Loire (QUETE project) [2015-09035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study aimed to assess the ability of muscle stiffness (shear modulus) and response to electrically-induced muscle contraction to detect changes in muscle properties over a 12-month period in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Ten children with DMD and nine age-matched healthy male controls participated in two experimental sessions (T-0 and T+12month) separated by 12.4 +/- 0.9 months. Two contractions of the biceps brachii were electrically-induced during which an ultrasound probe was placed over the muscle. The resting shear modulus was measured using elastography from six muscles. Evoked maximal torque was increased at Lumonths in controls (+11.2 +/- 7.6%, P< 0.001) but was not modified in children with DMD (P = 0.222). Electromechanical delay (+12.9 11.3%, P< 0.001) and its force transmission component (+10.1 +/- 21.6%, P = 0.003) were significantly longer at T+12months than To for children with DMD. The results revealed an increase in muscle stiffness at T+12months in children with DMD for tibialis anterior (+75.1 +/- 93.5%, P = 0.043), gastrocnemius medialis (+144.8 +/- 180.6%, P = 0.050) and triceps brachii (+35.5 +/- 32.2%, P = 0.005). This 12-month follow-up study demonstrates that electromechanical delay and elastography may help detect subtle muscle impairments in patients with DMD. These sensitive outcomes may improve the follow-up of innovative therapeutic interventions within the field of DMD. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据