4.7 Article

Long-term antithrombotic treatment in intracranial hemorrhage survivors with atrial fibrillation

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 89, 期 7, 页码 687-696

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004235

关键词

-

资金

  1. Imperial College London
  2. St. Mary's development fund
  3. National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Dutch Heart Foundation [2009B046]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Health-Instituto de Salud Carlos III: Redes tematicas de Investigacion Cooperativa [INVICTUS RD012/0014/0002]
  6. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional
  7. Canadian Stroke Network (CSN)
  8. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)
  9. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
  10. Ontario MOHLTC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting recurrent intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and ischemic stroke (IS) in ICH survivors with atrial fibrillation (AF) during long-term follow-up. Methods: A comprehensive literature search including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, clinical trials registry was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We considered studies capturing outcome events (ICH recurrence and IS) for $ 3 months and treatment exposure to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), antiplatelet agents (APAs), or no antithrombotic medication (no-ATM). Corresponding authors provided aggregate data for IS and ICH recurrence rate between 6 weeks after the event and 1 year of follow-up for each treatment exposure. Meta-analyses of pooled rate ratios (RRs) were conducted with the inverse variance method. Results: Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria. Seven observational studies enrolling 2,452 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled RR estimates for IS were lower for VKAs compared to APAs (RR = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.74, p = 0.002) and no-ATM (RR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.77, p 5 0.002). Pooled RR estimates for ICH recurrence were not significantly increased across treatment groups (VKA vs APA: RR 5=1.34, 95% CI 0.79-2.30, p = 0.28; VKA vs no-ATM: RR 5 0.93, 95% CI 0.45-1.90, p = 0.84). Conclusions: In observational studies, anticoagulation with VKA is associated with a lower rate of IS than APA or no-ATM without increasing ICH recurrence significantly. A randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the net clinical benefit of anticoagulation in ICH survivors with AF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据