4.8 Article

Testing sub-gravitational forces on atoms from a miniature in-vacuum source mass

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 938-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS4189

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation under CAREER Grant [PHY-1056620]
  2. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [1553641, 1531033, 1465360]
  4. DARPA [N66001-12-1-4232]
  5. NSF CAREER Award [PHY-1145525]
  6. NASA ATP grant [NNX11AI95G]
  7. Charles E. Kaufman Foundation of the Pittsburgh Foundation
  8. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [J3680]
  9. Division Of Physics
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1145525] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [J3680] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional gravity measurements use bulk masses to both source and probe gravitational fields(1). Matter-wave interferometers enable the use of probe masses as small as neutrons(2), atoms(3) and molecular clusters(4), but still require fields generated by masses ranging from hundreds of kilograms(5,6) to the entire Earth. Shrinking the sources would enable versatile configurations, improve positioning accuracy, enable tests for beyond-standard-model ('fifth') forces, and allow observation of non-classical effects of gravity. Here we detect the gravitational force between freely falling caesium atoms and an in- vacuum, miniature (centimetre-sized, 0.19 kg) source mass using atom interferometry. Sensitivity down to gravitational strength forces accesses the natural scale(7) for a wide class of cosmologically motivated scalar field models(8,9) of modified gravity and dark energy. We improve the limits on two such models, chameleons(9) and symmetrons(10,11), by over two orders of magnitude. We expect further tests of dark energy theories, and measurements of Newton's gravitational constant and the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect(12).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据