4.3 Article

Aptamer Combined with Fluorescent Silica Nanoparticles for Detection of Hepatoma Cells

期刊

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s11671-017-1890-6

关键词

Aptamer; Fluorescent nanoparticles; Hepatoma; Cancer

资金

  1. Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [81430055]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Teams at University (Ministry of Education of China) [IRT_15R13]
  3. International Cooperation Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [20 15DFA31320]
  4. Project for Innovative Research Teams (Guangxi Natural Science Foundation) [2015GXNSFFA139001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a simple, effective method to label hepatoma cells with aptamers and then detect them using fluorescent silica nanoparticles (FSNPs). Method: Streptavidin was conjugated to carboxyl-modified fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-doped silica nanoparticles which were prepared by the reverse microemulsion method. The resulting streptavidin-conjugated fluorescent silica nanoparticles (SA-FSNPs) were mixed with hepatoma cells that had been labeled with biotin-conjugated aptamer TLS11a (Bio-TLS11a). The specificity and sensitivity of the nanoprobes were assessed using flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. Their toxicity was assessed in normal human liver cell cultures using the MTT assay, as well as in nude mice using immunohistochemistry. Results: SA-FSNPs showed uniform size and shape, and fluorescence properties of them was similar to the free FITC dye. SA-FSNPs were able to detect aptamer-labeled hepatoma cells with excellent specificity and good sensitivity, and they emitted strong, photobleach-resistant fluorescent signal. SA-FSNPs showed no significant toxic effects in vitro or in vivo. Conclusion: The combination of biotin-conjugated aptamers and SA-FSNPs shows promise for sensitive detection of hepatoma cells, and potentially of other tumor cell types as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据