4.8 Article

Improving the structural stability of Li-rich cathode materials via reservation of cations in the Li-slab for Li-ion batteries

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 4201-4209

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-017-1489-3

关键词

Li-ion batteries; cathode materials; lithium-rich; voltage decay

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0202500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51225204, 21127901]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA09010000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-capacity Li-rich cathode materials can significantly improve the energy density of lithium-ion batteries, which is the key limitation to miniaturization of electronic devices and further improvement of electrical-vehicle mileage. However, severe voltage decay hinders the further commercialization of these materials. Insights into the relationship between the inherent structural stability and external appearance of the voltage decay in high-energy Li-rich cathode materials are critical to solve this problem. Here, we demonstrate that structural evolution can be significantly inhibited by the intentional introduction of certain adventive cations (such as Ni2+) or by premeditated reservation of some of the original Li+ ions in the Li slab in the delithiated state. The voltage decay of Li-rich cathode materials over 100 cycles decreased from 500 to 90 or 40 mV upon introducing Ni2+ or retaining some Li+ ions in the Li slab, respectively. The cations in the Li slab can serve as stabilizers to reduce the repulsion between the two neighboring oxygen layers, leading to improved thermodynamic stability. Meanwhile, the cations also suppress transition metal ion migration into the Li slab, thereby inhibiting structural evolution and mitigating voltage decay. These findings provide insights into the origin of voltage decay in Li-rich cathode materials and set new guidelines for designing these materials for high-energy-density Li-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据