4.6 Article

A recommendation engine for travel products based on topic sequential patterns

期刊

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
卷 76, 期 16, 页码 17595-17612

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-017-4406-6

关键词

Travel recommendation; Frequent sequential pattern; Cold-start users; Web server logs; Long tail items; Recommender system

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB1000901]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91646204, 71571093, 71372188]
  3. National Center for International Joint Research on E-Business Information Processing [2013B01035]
  4. Industry Projects in Jiangsu S&T Pillar Program [BE2014141]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Travel products recommendation has become one of emerging issues in the realm of recommendation systems. The widely-used collaborative filtering algorithms are usually difficult to be used for recommending travel products due to a number of reasons, including (1) the content of travel products is very complex, (2) the user-item matrix is extremely sparse, and (3) the cold-start users are widely existing. To tackle these issues, we try to exploit Web server logs for generating recommendation, and present a novel recommendation engine (SECT for short) for travel products based on topic sequential patterns. In detail, we first extract topics from semantic description of every Web page. Then, we mine topic frequent sequential patterns and their target products to form click patterns library. At last, we propose a Markov n-gram model for matching the real-time click-stream of users with the click patterns library and thus computing recommendation scores. Experimental results on a real-world travel dataset demonstrate that the SECT prevails over the state-of-art baseline algorithms. In particular, SECT shows merits in improving the both coverage and accuracy for recommending products to cold-start users. Also, SECT is effective to recommend long tail items and outperform baseline algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据