4.6 Article

Highly Efficient Enzymatic Preparation of Daidzein in Deep Eutectic Solvents

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules22010186

关键词

deep eutectic solvents; daidzein; enzymatic hydrolysis; response surface methodology; optimization

资金

  1. International Cooperation Projects of Shanxi Province [2014081049-1]
  2. Program of Science and Technology Development Plan of Shanxi Province [2014ZDO0402]
  3. Science and Technology Research Plan of Shanxi Province [20140313021-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Daidzein, which is scarce in nature, has gained significant attention due to its superior biological activity and bioavailability compared with daidzin. So far, it has been widely used in the medicine and health care products industries. The enzymatic approach for the preparation of daidzein has prevailed, benefitted by its high efficiency and eco-friendly nature. Our present research aimed at providing a preparation method of daidzein by enzymatic hydrolysis of daidzin in a new green reaction medium-deep eutectic solvents (DESs). Herein, the DESs were screened via evaluating enzyme activity, enzyme stability and the substrate solubility, and the DES (ChCl/EG 2:1, 30 vol %) was believed to be the most appropriate co-solvent to improve the bioconversion efficiency. Based on the yield of daidzein, response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to model and optimize the reaction parameters. Under these optimum process conditions, the maximum yield of 97.53% was achieved and the purity of daidzein crude product reached more than 70%, which is more efficient than conversions in DESs-free buffer. Importantly, it has been shown that DESs medium could be reused for six batches of the process with a final conversion of above 50%. The results indicated that this procedure could be considered a mild, environmentally friendly, highly efficient approach to the economical production of daidzein, with a simple operation process and without any harmful reagents being involved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据