4.4 Article

Structure, aromaticity and reactivity of corannulene and its analogues: a conceptual density functional theory and density functional reactivity theory study

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYSICS
卷 116, 期 7-8, 页码 956-968

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2017.1403657

关键词

Aromaticity; corannulene; coronene; conceptual density functional theory; density functional reactivity theory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21503076]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2017JJ3201]
  3. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduates [CX2017B179]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201706720015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corannulene is an interesting yet special molecule, which has witnessed widespread applications. It is aromatic, but not planar and the total number of 20 electrons is in conflict with Huckel's 4n + 2 rule. In this work, we design a series of analogous model systems based on this molecule with the central ring size extended from five members to three to eight members. A number of theoretical and analytical tools available in the literature are employed to systematically examine their structure, aromaticity and reactivity properties. We found that structurally speaking, they change from bowl-like to planar and then to saddle shapes as the central ring size increases from three to eight. From the reactivity perspective, species with five and six-membered-rings in the centre are chemically more stable and less reactive, which are confirmed by the numerical results from aromaticity indexes and quantities from the information-theoretic approach. Overall, our results show that only corannulene and its six-membered-ring, coronene, analogue are aromatic. Even though these two systems are aromatic in nature, they are markedly different in a number of ways in structure, reactivity and other properties. These results should provide with us insights and understanding about the phenomenon of three-dimensional and non-planarity aromaticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据