4.7 Article

Supermatrix phylogeny and biogeography of the Australasian Meliphagides radiation (Ayes: Passeriformes)

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 516-529

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.021

关键词

Meliphagides; Molecular phylogeny; Systematics; Australia; New Guinea; Honeyeaters

资金

  1. National Geographic Research and Exploration grant [8853-10]
  2. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF96]
  3. Natural History Museum, University of Oslo
  4. Carlsberg Foundation [CF15-0078, CF15-0079]
  5. Swedish Research Council [621-2014-5113]
  6. Chadwick Biodiversity Fellowship from the Australian Museum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With nearly 300 species, the infraorder Meliphagides represents one of the largest and most conspicuous Australasian bird radiations. Although the group has been the focus of a number of recent phylogenetic studies, a comprehensive species-level phylogenetic hypothesis is still lacking. This has impeded the assessment of broad-scale evolutionary, biogeographic and ecological hypotheses. In the present study, we use a supermatrix approach including five mitochondrial and four nuclear markers to infer a time calibrated phylogeny of the Meliphagides. Our phylogeny, which includes 286 of the 289 (99%) currently recognized species, is largely congruent with previous estimates. However, the addition of 60 newly sequenced species reveals some novel relationships. Our biogeographic analyses suggest an Australian origin for the group in the early Oligocene (31.3 Mya, 95% HPD 25.2-38.2 Mya). In addition, we find that dispersal events out of Australia have been numerous and frequent, particularly to New Guinea, which has also been the source of multiple back-colonizations to the Australian mainland. The phylogeny provides an important framework for studying a wide variety of macroecological and macroevolutionary themes, including character evolution, origin and timing of diversification, biogeographic patterns and species responses to climate change. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据