4.5 Article

Polyaniline promotes peripheral nerve regeneration by enhancement of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor and ciliary neurotrophic factor expression and activation of the ERK1/2/MAPK signaling pathway

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 7534-7540

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7534

关键词

polyaniline; sciatic nerve; regeneration; Schwann cells; brain-derived neurotrophic factor; ciliary neurotrophic factor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China: United Foundation with Xinjiang [U1403222]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A previous study has demonstrated a progression in the nerve regeneration by polyaniline/cellulose (PANI/RC), although the underlying mechanism was not elucidated. In the present study, regenerated nerves were investigated, using histological techniques, functional assays and western blot analysis. The triceps surae muscle weight ratio percentages of the sham, regenerated cellulose (RC) and the PANI/RC groups were 38.88 +/- 4.76 and 76.32 +/- 7.11%, respectively. The thickness of the myelin sheath for the aforementioned groups were as follows: 1.2 +/- 0.27; 0.49 +/- 0.21 and 0.93 +/- 0.28 mu l. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were highly expressed in the regenerated nerve in the presence of polyaniline. Phosphorylated extracellular kinase (p-ERK)1/2 expression in the PANI/RC group was significantly elevated compared with the RC group (1.83-fold) and the sham group (4.92-fold). The expression of the axon sprout-associated proteins, such as Tau, alpha-tubulin and growth associated protein-43, were increased (1.64, 1.59 and 1.24-fold, respectively) compared with the RC group. The results demonstrated that PANI enhances the expression and secretion of BDNF and CNTF, activates the ERK1/2 signaling pathway and increases the expression levels of the GAP-43, Tau and alpha-tubulin, suggesting an insight into nerve regeneration and possible clinical interventions in nerve injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据