4.6 Article

Combining drought and submergence tolerance in rice: marker-assisted breeding and QTL combination effects

期刊

MOLECULAR BREEDING
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-017-0737-2

关键词

Rice; Drought; Yield; Submergence; QTL; MABB

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TDK1 is a popular rice variety from the Lao PDR. Originally developed for irrigated conditions, this variety suffers a high decline in yield under drought conditions. Studies have identified three quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for grain yield under drought conditions, qDTY (3.1) , qDTY (6.1) , and qDTY (6.2) , that show a high effect in the background of this variety. We report here the pyramiding of these three QTLs with SUB1 that provides 2-3 weeks of tolerance to complete submergence, with the aim to develop drought- and submergence-tolerant near-isogenic lines (NILs) of TDK1. We used a tandem approach that combined marker-assisted backcross breeding with phenotypic selection to develop NILs with high yield under drought stress and non-stress conditions and preferred grain quality. The effect of different QTL combinations on yield and yield-related traits under drought stress and non-stress conditions is also reported. Our results show qDTY (3.1) to be the largest and most consistent QTL affecting yield under drought conditions, followed by qDTY (6.1) and qDTY (6.2) , respectively. QTL class analysis also showed that lines with a combination of qDTY (3.1) and qDTY (6.1) consistently showed a higher tolerance to drought than those in which one of these QTLs was missing. In countries such as Lao PDR, where large areas under rice cultivation suffer vegetative-stage submergence and reproductive-stage drought, these lines could ensure yield stability. These lines can also serve as valuable genetic material to be used for further breeding of high-yielding, drought- and submergence-tolerant varieties in local breeding programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据