4.5 Article

Gamma secretase inhibitor impairs epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition induced by TGF-β in ovarian tumor cell lines

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 440, 期 C, 页码 125-137

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.11.025

关键词

Gamma secretase inhibitor; Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; TGF-beta; Cadherin switch; Metastasis; Ovarian cancer

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technical Research [CONICET-PIP] [380]
  2. ROEMMERS Foundation
  3. ANPCYT-PICT, Argentina [2010-0248]
  4. ANPCYT, Argentina [2011-2044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ovarian cancer is characterized by being highly metastatic, a feature that represents the main cause of failure of the treatment. This study investigated the effects of gamma-secretase inhibition on the TGF-beta-induced epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) process in ovarian cancer cell lines. SKOV3 cells incubated in the presence of TGF-beta showed morphological and biochemical changes related to EMT, which were blocked by co-stimulation with TGF-beta and the gamma-secretase inhibitor DAPT. In SKOV3 and IGROVI cells, the co-stimulation blocked the cadherin switch and the increase in the transcription factors Snail, Slug, Twist and Zebl induced by TGF-beta. DAPT impaired the translocation of phospho-beta-catenin to the inner cell compartment observed in TGF-beta-treated cells, but was not able to block the induction at protein level induced by TGF-beta. Moreover, the inhibitor blocked the increased cell migration and invasiveness ability of both cell lines induced by TGF-beta. Notch target genes (Hes1 and Hey1) were induced by TGF-beta, decreased by DAPT treatment and remained low in the presence of both stimuli. However, DAPT alone caused no effects on most of the parameters analyzed. These results demonstrate that the gamma-secretase inhibitor used in this study exerted a blockade on TGF-beta-induced EMT in ovarian cancer cells. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据