4.7 Article

Effect of aging on silica aerogel properties

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 293-302

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.11.037

关键词

Aerogel; Aging; Solid-state NMR; SAXS; BET

资金

  1. Adolphe Merkle Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P2133597/1, PP00P2_159258]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P2_159258] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silica aerogels' unique physical and chemical properties make them fascinating materials for a wide variety of applications. In addition to hydrophobization by silylation, aging is very important in the synthesis of silica aerogel by ambient pressure drying. Here we systematically study the effect of aging on the physico-chemical properties of silica aerogel with emphasis on ambient dried materials. Silica gels were aged for different times and at different temperatures in their gelation liquid (without solvent exchange), hydrophobized in hexamethyldisiloxane and subsequently dried either at ambient pressure or from supercritical CO2. Dynamic oscillatory rheological measurements demonstrate that aging reinforces the alcogels, particularly at high strain. The specific surface area decreases with increasing aging time and temperature as a consequence of Ostwald ripening processes during aging. With increasing aging time and temperature, the linear shrinkage and bulk density decrease and the pore size and pore volume increase for the ambient dried gels, but remain nearly constant for supercritically dried gels. Small-Angle X-ray scattering does not detect significant structural changes at length scales smaller than about hundred nanometers, but hints at systematic variations at larger length scales. The findings of this study highlight the importance of aging to increase the ability of the gel particle network to withstand irreversible pore collapse during ambient pressure drying. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据