4.7 Article

Integration of Biomass Formulations of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models with Experimental Data Reveals Universally Essential Cofactors in Prokaryotes

期刊

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 200-208

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.12.002

关键词

Essential cofactors; Metabolic networks; Genome-scale models

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal [SFRH/BD/81626/2011]
  2. European Union [686070]
  3. European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  4. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UID/BIO/04469/2013]
  5. COMPETE [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684]
  6. BioTecNorte operation - European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/81626/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The composition of a cell in terms of macromolecular building blocks and other organic molecules underlies the metabolic needs and capabilities of a species. Although some core biomass components such as nucleic acids and proteins are evident for most species, the essentiality of the pool of other organic molecules, especially cofactors and prosthetic groups, is yet unclear. Here we integrate biomass compositions from 71 manually curated genome-scale models, 33 large-scale gene essentiality datasets, enzyme-cofactor association data and a vast array of publications, revealing universally essential cofactors for prokaryotic metabolism and also others that are specific for phylogenetic branches or metabolic modes. Our results revise predictions of essential genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae and identify missing biosynthetic pathways in models of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This work provides fundamental insights into the essentiality of organic cofactors and has implications for minimal cell studies as well as for modeling genotype-phenotype relations in prokaryotic metabolic networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据