4.2 Article

Synthesis and molecular docking study of novel alizarin derivatives containing phosphoryl amino acid moiety as potential antitumor agents

期刊

MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 10, 页码 2363-2374

出版社

SPRINGER BIRKHAUSER
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-017-1938-2

关键词

Alizarin; Phosphoryl amino acid; Antitumor; Apoptosis; Molecular docking

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81260472, 21101035, 21362002]
  2. Special Research Found for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20134504110002]
  3. State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for the Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources, Ministry of Science and Technology of China [CMEMR2016-B06]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [1107047002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Series of novel alizarin and phosphoryl amino acid scaffold (4a-4d, 8a-8d) were synthesized and evaluated for the suppression of cancer cell proliferation in vitro against MGC-803, HepG2, T24, NCI-H460, and SK-OV-3 cell lines by standard 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay compared with commercial anticancer drug doxorubicin. Interestingly, all newly synthesized compounds exhibited relatively high cytotoxicity compared with alizarin and low cytotoxicity against human normal liver cell line HL-7702 cells. Especially, compound 8d showed the best cytotoxicity against SK-OV-3 cells with IC50 7.09 A mu M, which was slightly worse than that of drug doxorubicin. The cell apoptosis-inducing activity of representative compound 8d in SK-OV-3 cells revealed that the anticancer activity of this compound depended on apoptosis of cancer cells via regulation of Bcl-2 family members, activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3. Cell cycle analysis confirmed that compound 8d mainly arrested SK-OV-3 cells in G2 stage. In addition, molecular docking studies were performed to position compound 8d into the telomerase (5CQG) active site to determine the probable binding model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据