4.2 Article

Reef height drives threshold dynamics of restored oyster reefs

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 582, 期 -, 页码 1-13

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps12362

关键词

Crassostrea virginica; Reef height; Sedimentation; Thresholds; Alternative stable states; Oyster reef; Restoration

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Division of Mathematical Sciences [DMS-1313243]
  2. US Army Corps of Engineers - Norfolk District
  3. NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office
  4. Virginia Governor's School Program for Gifted High School Students
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1313093] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonlinear threshold responses to biotic or abiotic forcing may produce multiple population trajectories dependent upon initial conditions, which can reinforce population recovery or drive local ex tinction, yet experimental tests of this phenomenon are lacking in marine ecosystems. In field experiments at 4 sites in 2 tributaries of lower Chesapeake Bay, we examined demographic responses (density and survival) of eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica populations to reef height and associated gradients in sediment deposition and habitat complexity. After 2 yr, oyster reefs exhibited diverging trajectories to ward either degradation or persistence, dependent upon initial reef height. Reefs higher than 0.3 m supported greater oyster density, survival, and reef complexity, whereas sediment deposition was reduced. Reefs lower than 0.3 m experienced heavy sediment deposition and were eventually buried. These observations (1) provide experimental evidence for threshold dynamics in marine species, (2) suggest that the collapse of oyster populations was largely due to anthropo genic habitat degradation that eliminated positive feed backs and which may have created an alternative reef trajectory towards local extinction, and (3) indicate an avenue by which oyster restoration is achievable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据