4.7 Article

Biological and Chemical Diversity of Bacteria Associated with a Marine Flatworm

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/md15090281

关键词

marine flatworm; natural products; bacteria; Paraplanocera sp.; Streptomyces sp.; geldanamycin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41576146]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A030313227]
  3. Scientific and Technical Innovation Council of Shenzhen Government [827000041, 827000012]
  4. Innovation program of Shenzhen [JCYJ20160428181415376]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this research is to explore the biological and chemical diversity of bacteria associated with a marine flatworm Paraplanocera sp., and to discover the bioactive metabolites from culturable strains. A total of 141 strains of bacteria including 45 strains of actinomycetes and 96 strains of other bacteria were isolated, identified and fermented on a small scale. Bioactive screening (antibacterial and cytotoxic activities) and chemical screening (ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS)) yielded several target bacterial strains. Among these strains, the ethyl acetate (EA) crude extract of Streptomyces sp. XY-FW47 fermentation broth showed strong antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC43300 (MRSA ATCC43300) and potent cytotoxic effects on HeLa cells. The UPLC-MS spectral analysis of the crude extract indicated that the strain XY-FW47 could produce a series of geldanamycins (GMs). One new geldanamycin (GM) analog, 4,5-dihydro-17-O-demethylgeldanamycin (1), and three known GMs (2-4) were obtained. All of these compounds were tested for antibacterial, cytotoxic, and antifungal activities, yet only GM (3) showed potent cytotoxic (HeLa cells, EC50 = 1.12 mu g/mL) and antifungal (Setosphaeria turcica MIC = 2.40 mu g/mL) activities. Their structure-activity relationship (SAR) was also preliminarily discussed in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据