4.4 Article

Habitat-dependent niche partitioning between colour morphs of the algal-dwelling shrimp Hippolyte obliquimanus

期刊

MARINE BIOLOGY
卷 164, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-017-3247-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo-FAPESP [2012/17003-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trait-based differences among individuals are common and particularly important for polymorphic species in which alternative morphs exploit the same habitat types but occupy different trophic niches. The shrimp Hippolyte obliquimanus inhabits shallow-water vegetated habitats, particularly the seasonal and physically complex brown alga Sargassum furcatum and the less-structured but temporally stable red weed Galaxaura marginata. Two main colour morphs can be found in these habitats: homogeneous colour-changing shrimp that are able to match to their background and show little mobility, and transparent shrimp with coloured stripes, which cannot match their background, show lower habitat fidelity and are more evenly distributed between algal habitats. We used carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes and Bayesian mixing models to test whether morphspecific patterns of habitat use observed for H. obliquimanus living in Sargassum and Galaxaura meadows also influence trophic niche segregation. We observed morph-specific trophic differences that varied with habitat, with narrower niche space and lower niche overlap between morphs in Galaxaura meadows, and broader niche space and higher niche overlap between morphs in Sargassum habitat. Niche segregation between morphs occurred only in Galaxaura, where available resources are presumably less abundant than in Sargassum and the strength of competition between morphs is higher. Resource availability and habitat stability are likely driving dietary niche segregation between shrimp morphs, which can ultimately affect population dynamics and community composition in a spatially heterogeneous and seasonal habitat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据