4.5 Article

A single-shot T2 mapping protocol based on echo-split gradient-spin-echo acquisition and parametric multiplexed sensitivity encoding based on projection onto convex sets reconstruction

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 79, 期 1, 页码 383-393

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26696

关键词

T-2 mapping; GRASE; parametric-POCSMUSE; extended phase graph analysis; echo-split GRASE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo develop a high-speed T-2 mapping protocol that is capable of accurately measuring T-2 relaxation time constants from a single-shot acquisition. TheoryA new echo-split single-shot gradient-spin-echo (GRASE) pulse sequence is developed to acquire multicontrast data while suppressing signals from most nonprimary echo pathways in Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) echoes. Residual nonprimary pathway signals are taken into consideration when performing T-2 mapping using a parametric multiplexed sensitivity encoding based on projection onto convex sets (parametric-POCSMUSE) reconstruction method that incorporates extended phase graph modeling of GRASE signals. MethodsThe single-shot echo-split GRASE-based T-2 mapping procedure was evaluated in human studies at 3 Tesla. The acquired data were compared with reference data obtained with a more time-consuming interleaved spin-echo echo planar imaging protocol. T-2 maps derived from conventional single-shot GRASE scans, in which nonprimary echo pathways were not appropriately addressed, were also evaluated. ResultsUsing the developed single-shot T-2 mapping protocol, quantitatively accurate T-2 maps can be obtained with a short scan time (<0.2 seconds per slice). ConclusionAccurate T-2 mapping with minimal signal contamination from CPMG high-order echo pathways can be achieved by the developed method that integrates single-shot echo-split GRASE acquisition and parametric-POCSMUSE reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 79:383-393, 2018. (c) 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据