4.7 Article

Size fractionated phytoplankton biomass and net metabolism along a tropical estuarine gradient

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 S309-S326

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lno.10562

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Agency for International Development and Cooperation (AECID) [C/023621/09, D/031020/10, A1/037457/11]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTM2013-43857-R, P11-RNM-7199]
  3. Andalusian Regional Government
  4. University of Costa Rica (UCR) [808-B3-127]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Size structure of phytoplankton determines to a large degree the trophic interactions in oceanic and coastal waters and eventually the destiny of its biomass. Although, tropical estuarine systems are some of the most productive systems worldwide compared to temperate systems, little is known about phytoplankton biomass size fractions, their contribution to net metabolism, or the ecological factors driving phytoplankton size distribution in tropical estuaries. Hence, we measured the size-fractionated biomass and net metabolism of the plankton community along a salinity and nutrient gradient in the Gulf of Nicoya estuary (Costa Rica), during the dry season. Respiration (23.6 mmol O-2 m(-3) h(-1)) was highest at the estuary head, whereas maximum net primary production (23.1 mmol O-2 m(-3) h(-1)) was observed in the middle of the estuary, coinciding with the chlorophyll a maximum (15.9 mg m(-3)). Thus, only the middle section of the estuary was net autotrophic (2.9 g C m(-2) d(-1)), with the rest of the estuary being net heterotrophic. Regression analysis identified light availability, and not nutrients, as the principal factor limiting primary production in the estuary due to increased turbidity. The changes in net metabolism along the estuary were also reflected in the phytoplankton's size structure. Although micro- and picophytoplankton were the most productive fractions overall, in the middle section of the estuary nanophytoplankton dominated primary production, chlorophyll, and autotrophic biomass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据