4.7 Article

Access to urban green space and environmental inequalities in Germany

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 124-131

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.002

关键词

Urban green; Indicator; Household and individual level; Geo-coded data; Environmental inequalities

资金

  1. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation [FKZ: 3512 82 1400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although sufficient and equitable access to urban green represents a key aspect for adequate living conditions and a healthy environment in urban areas, national studies investigating the provision of urban green on household and individual level are scarce. We present a study investigating access to urban green space and environmental inequalities in German major cities by merging geo-coded household data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) and Census Population Data with land use data from the European Urban Atlas (EUA). The results indicate that 92.8% of the German population has access to green space within a 500 m around the place of residence. On average an individual in German major cities lives in a distance of 183 m to the nearest green space and has access to 4.4 ha urban green within a 500 m buffer and the average green space provision per capita amounts to 8.1 m(2). We also identify strong disparities in green space provision on city level ranging from 2.5 m(2) per capita (city of Schwerin) to 36.3 m(2) (city of Bergisch Gladbach) within 500 m buffer around the place of residence. We further identify inequalities in green space provision across German major cities by applying the Gini coefficient. Statistical analysis of the socio-economic background of households and individuals shows differences in urban green provision related to income, age, education and children in household. The findings provide helpful information for policy and planning to ensure an adequate green space provision and to eliminate environmental inequalities in Germany.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据