4.7 Article

iCity 3D: A geosimualtion method and tool for three-dimensional modeling of vertical urban development

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 356-367

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.021

关键词

3D geosimulation; Geographic information systems (GIS); Vertical urban development; Urban land use change modeling; 3D building objects; Procedural modeling

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Discovery Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous North American cities are experiencing constant population growth in regions with limited available land, encouraging urban densification processes with development in the vertical direction. Vertical urban development (VUD) is a form of mid- and high-rise building development, that supports urban compactness and is inherently a three-dimensional (3D) spatial process. Land use designations, population density, and basic services are key criteria for identifying optimal locations for vertical development of mid-and high-rise buildings. The main objective of this research study is to develop iCity 3D, a 3D geosimulation modeling method and tool to represent VUD change over time. This geosimulation model consist of two stages: the urban densification land suitability analysis and the 3D generation of extruded buildings at a cadastral lot resolution. The proposed 3D geosimulation model was developed using ESRI's CityEngine software and routines were programmed with the Computer Generated Architecture (CGA) language. The City of Surrey, Canada, was used as a case study to implement the iCity 3D model and to simulate two scenarios of possible vertical development. The results of the simulations indicate that the augmented mid-and high-rise 3D building objects generated from the year 2011-2040 occur near transportation networks, urban centres, and higher population densities. The proposed iCity 3D model has the potential use in urban planning and decision-making processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据