4.7 Article

A composite score associated with spontaneous operational tolerance in kidney transplant recipients

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 1473-1481

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.12.020

关键词

biomarker; gene expression; graft survival; operational tolerance; renal transplantation

资金

  1. National Research Agency [ANR-11-LABX-0016-01]
  2. LABEX TRANSPLANTEX [ANR-11-LABX0070_TRANSPLANTEX]
  3. INSERM
  4. French Government
  5. European Commission's Seventh Framework Program [305147]
  6. FP7 VISICORT [602470]
  7. Fondation Jean Valade
  8. National Institute of Allergy And Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [UM1AI109565]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New challenges in renal transplantation include using biological information to devise a useful clinical test for discerning high- and low-risk patients for individual therapy and ascertaining the best combination and appropriate dosages of drugs. Based on a 20-gene signature from a microarray meta-analysis performed on 46 operationally tolerant patients and 266 renal transplant recipients with stable function, we applied the sparse Bolasso methodology to identify a minimal and robust combination of six genes and two demographic parameters associated with operational tolerance. This composite score of operational tolerance discriminated operationally tolerant patients with an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.94-1.00). The score was not influenced by immunosuppressive treatment, center of origin, donor type, or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder history of the patients. This composite score of operational tolerance was significantly associated with both de novo anti-HLA antibodies and tolerance loss. It was validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using independent samples and demonstrated specificity toward a model of tolerance induction. Thus, our score would allow clinicians to improve follow-up of patients, paving the way for individual therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据