4.6 Article

Enucleation of non-invasive tumors in the proximal pancreas: indications and outcomes compared with standard resections

期刊

JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 906-916

出版社

ZHEJIANG UNIV
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1600597

关键词

Enucleation; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Central pancreatectomy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30672072, 30872531]
  2. Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province, China [2014C 33187]
  3. National High-Tech R&D Program (863) of China [2007AA02Z476]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of enucleation (EU) for proximal pancreatic non-invasive neoplasms. Methods: Patients with solitary non-invasive neoplasms in the proximal pancreas from January 1998 to April 2014 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China were included. Different operations and outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 123 patients were enrolled. Forty patients (32.5%) underwent EU including 18 patients who had tumors close to the main pancreatic duct (MPD). Sixty-one patients (49.6%) had pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) performed and 22 (17.9%) underwent central pancreatectomy (CP). Pathological outcomes included neuroendocrine tumors, cystic lesions, and solid pseudopapillary tumors. Operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and duration of hospital stay were significantly reduced in the EU group. PD was associated with the greatest complication rate (55.7%), followed by EU (50%) and CP (40.9%), though the pancreatic fistula rate after EU was the highest (50%), especially in patients with tumors larger than 3 cm and tumors close to the MPD. EU had advantages in the preservation of pancreatic parenchyma and endocrine and exocrine function. Conclusions: EU can be carried out safely and effectively for tumors in the proximal pancreas with improved outcomes compared with standard resections, even if the tumor is larger than 3 cm and close to the MPD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据