4.7 Article

Photo-decolorization and ecotoxicological effects of solar compound parabolic collector pilot plant and artificial light photocatalysis of indigo carmine dye

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 571-580

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.09.029

关键词

Solar pilot plant; CI Food Blue 1; Real wastewater; Daphnia similis; Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata; Titanium dioxide

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [ERA-MNT/0003/2009, ERA-MNT/0004/2009]
  2. Faperj
  3. ENSP/FIOCRUZ
  4. Ciencia sem Fronteiras program
  5. CNPq [CNPq/PROEP 400107/2011-2]
  6. CONACyT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico)
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [ERA-MNT/0003/2009, ERA-MNT/0004/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to analyze the photocatalytic degradation of C.I. Food Blue 1 under artificial and solar irradiation using titanium dioxide and to evaluate the ecotoxicity of the photo-degradation products in organisms of two different food chain levels. Three different artificial-light and geometric photoreactors were evaluated for the ideal amount of catalyst and UV-light time irradiation. The optimized experiments were performed in a solar compound parabolic collector pilot plant with different water matrices (distilled water, freshwater, synthetic and real MWWTP) at Plataforma Solar de Almeria. Photo-degradation of the indigo dye was followed by UV-Vis spectroscopy, high performance liquid chromatography, total organic carbon and ion chromatography. Solar pilot plant photocatalysis was efficient for different water matrices but the photodegradation was found to be somewhat slower for the more complex matrixes. Ecotoxicological evaluation with Daphnia similis and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata showed that photodegradation products were more toxic than untreated indigo carmine and that titanium residues affected the two tested species. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据