4.3 Article

Performance of Mixed Species and Mono-specific Algal Diets for Culture of Larval Western School Prawns, Metapenaeus dalli

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 845-856

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jwas.12484

关键词

algae; aquaculture; enhancement; penaeid; phytoplankton; restocking; shrimp

资金

  1. Recreational Fishing Initiatives Fund, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Government of Western Australia [2013/221]
  2. Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
  3. Australian Centre for Applied Aquaculture Research, South Metropolitan TAFE
  4. Murdoch University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of three mono-specific and four combinations of the diatoms Chaetoceros muelleri, Chaetoceros calcitrans, and the chlorophyte Tetraselmis suecica on survival, development, and dry weight of the western school prawn, Metapenaeus dalli, was assessed from protozoea I until mysis I. The development and dry weight of larvae were significantly greater when fed diets comprising C. muelleri and/or T. suecica. A fourth diet, consisting of all three microalgal species also performed just as well. Survival alone was a poor measure of the performance of the various diets. Larvae fed with C. calcitrans, either alone or in a mixed diet with either C. muelleri or T. suecica, had significantly slower development and lower dry weight. Overall performance, assessed using the normalized biomass development index, determined that both mono-specific and mixed diets containing C. muelleri and T. suecica were among the best for M. dalli larvae. These results for M. dalli are consistent with those found for commercially grown penaeid prawns. This study enhances the limited knowledge on the feeding requirements of metapenaeid prawn larvae. Moreover, the results will help improve hatchery methods for the aquaculture-based enhancement of M. dalli in the Swan-Canning Estuary and potentially increase the abundance of this iconic recreational species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据