4.5 Article

Influence of diabetes mellitus on longitudinal atrophy and cognition in Parkinson's disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 377, 期 -, 页码 122-126

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.04.010

关键词

Parkinson's disease with dementia; Parkinson's disease; Mild cognitive impairment; Diabetes mellitus

资金

  1. National Medical Research Council, Singapore [NMRC/NIG/1043/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on cognitive performance and longitudinal volumetric brain changes in a cohort of cognitively normal mild PD patients. Methods: Prospective study of idiopathic PD subjects who underwent baseline and follow-up MRI imaging and neuropsychological assessments at 6 month intervals for 3 years. Subjects were classified based on the presence (PD-DM) or absence of DM (PD-No DM) at baseline. Volumetric analysis was performed using FreeSurfer 5.3 image analysis suite. Brain volume and cognition were compared and analyzed cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Analyses were corrected for intracranial volume. Results: There were 65 PD-no DM and 12 PD-DM subjects at baseline with comparable global cognition at baseline. PD-DM subjects had lower cortical grey matter (GM), amygdala, frontal white matter and temporal white matter volumes and higher total white matter hyperintensity and periventricular hyperintensities. After mean follow-up of 29.08 months, there were 51 PD-no DM and 11 PD-DM subjects. PD-DM subjects demonstrated greater decline in MMSE and MOCA scores compared to PD-No DM. PD-DM subjects had a higher rate of atrophy in the cortical WM, particularly in the parietal and occipital white matter. Conclusion: Mild PD patients with DM have lower GM and WM volumes at baseline and higher WMH volumes, despite comparable cognitive scores. Longitudinally, DM in PD results in greater rate of cognitive decline, associated with higher WM atrophy. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据