4.6 Article

Apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis: results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14647

关键词

-

资金

  1. Celgene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPalmoplantar psoriasis is a variant of psoriasis vulgaris which can severely impair quality of life. ObjectivesThe main objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study were to assess the efficacy and impact on quality of life and work productivity of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis. MethodsA total of 100 patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis were randomized to either apremilast 30mg bid or placebo for 16weeks. At Week 16, all patients received apremilast 30mg bid until Week 32. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a Palmoplantar Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (PPPGA) of 0/1 at Week 16. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who achieved a PPPGA of 0/1 at Week 16 between patients randomized to apremilast (14%) and placebo (4%; P=0.1595). After 32weeks of treatment with apremilast, 24% of patients achieved a PPGA of 0/1. In addition, apremilast was superior to placebo in achieving Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPPASI) 75 (apremilast: 22%; placebo: 8%; P=0.0499), in improving PPPASI (apremilast: -7.47.1; placebo: -3.6 +/- 5.9; P=0.0167), Dermatology Life Quality Index score (apremilast: -4.3 +/- 5.1; placebo: -0.8 +/- 4.5; P=0.0004) and in reducing activity impairment (apremilast: -11.0 +/- 22.3; placebo: 2.5 +/- 25.5; P=0.0063). ConclusionDespite the absence of a significant difference between apremilast and placebo in proportion of patients achieving a PPPGA of 0/1, the presence of significant differences observed for several secondary endpoints suggests that apremilast may have a role in the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据