4.8 Article

Hydrogen-Bond Symmetrization Breakdown and Dehydrogenation Mechanism of FeO2H at High Pressure

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 139, 期 35, 页码 12129-12132

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b06528

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE-NNSA [DE-NA0001974]
  2. DOE-BES [DE-FG02-99ER45775]
  3. NSF [EAR-1446969, EAR-1345112, EAR-1447438]
  4. NSFC [21703004]
  5. NSAF [U1530402]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences [1345112] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. Division Of Earth Sciences [1446969] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cycling of hydrogen plays an important role in the geochemical evolution of our planet. Under high-pressure conditions, asymmetric hydroxyl bonds tend to form a symmetric O-H-O configuration in which H is positioned at the center of two O atoms. The symmetrization of O-H bonds improves their thermal stability and as such, water-bearing minerals can be present deeper in the Earth's lower mantle. However, how exactly H is recycled from the deep mantle remains unclear. Here, we employ first-principles free-energy landscape sampling methods together with high pressure-high temperature experiments to reveal the dehydrogenation mechanism of a water-bearing mineral, FeO2H, at deep mantle conditions. Experimentally, we show that similar to 50% H is released from symmetrically hydrogen-bonded epsilon-FeO2H upon transforming to a pyrite-type phase (Py-phase). By resolving the lowest-energy transition pathway from e-FeO2H to the Py-phase, we demonstrate that half of the O-H bonds in the mineral rupture during the structural transition, leading toward the breakdown of symmetrized hydrogen bonds and eventual dehydrogenation. Our study sheds new light on the stability of symmetric hydrogen bonds during structural transitions and provides a dehydrogenation mechanism for hydrous minerals existing in the deep mantle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据