4.7 Article

Numerical eduction of active multi-port data for in-duct obstructions

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
卷 411, 期 -, 页码 328-345

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.09.012

关键词

Multi-ports; Aeroacoustic; Duct acoustic; Linearized Navier Stokes; IDDES; Source; Orifice; Computational method; Turbulence modeling; Network modeling; Scattering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A numerical method for aeroacoustic source characterization of in-duct components at frequencies beyond the cut-on frequencies of several acoustic modes is presented. Assuming linearity and time invariance, any ducted component can be fully characterized using a network (multi-port) model including source strength and scattering. A two-step multi-source approach is applied to numerical data in order to educe the multi-port characteristics. First, a scale resolving compressible flow simulation, here the Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (IDDES), is run to compute the channel flow that also contains the acoustic sources. Second, a linear acoustic computation, here the Linearized Navier Stokes Equations (LNSE), around a mean flow is solved for different acoustic loads to determine the component's scattering. The work uncovers the high potential of two-step numerical multi-port eduction methods. Particularly, it is shown that the acoustic source power spectra can be accurately extracted from IDDES data and the total acoustic power prediction is very good. Furthermore, a good result in the scattering data obtained from a second computationally inexpensive LNSE computation is achieved. The approach is interesting when describing mid-size duct systems, for example ventilation systems in aircraft and buildings, with a moderate number of higher order modes propagating in the considered frequency range. Therefore, the increasing availability of compressible flow data opens a wide field of applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据