4.3 Article

Spray-drying as a tool to disperse conductive carbon inside Na2FePO4F particles by addition of carbon black or carbon nanotubes to the precursor solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 103-112

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-017-3717-x

关键词

Na2FePO4F; Spray-drying; Carbon black; Electrochemical properties; Energy storage; Mossbauer spectroscopy

资金

  1. Walloon Region [BATWAL - 1318146, 2015-1, 1510399]
  2. Belgian Fonds pour la Formation a la Recherche dans l'Industrie et l'Agriculture (FRIA) grant [1.E056.11]
  3. UT-Battelle, LLC [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  4. US Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, Na2FePO4F-carbon composite powders were prepared by spray-drying a solution of inorganic precursors with 10 and 20 wt% added carbon black (CB) or carbon nanotubes (CNTs). In order to compare the effect of CB and CNT when added to the precursor solutions, the structural, electrochemical, and morphological properties of the synthesized Na2FePO4F-xCB and Na2FePO4F-xCNT samples were systematically investigated. In both cases, X-ray diffraction shows that calcination at 600 A degrees C in argon leads to the formation of Na2FePO4F as the major inorganic phase. Fe-57 Mossbauer spectroscopy was used as complementary technique to probe the oxidation states, local environment, and identify the composition of the iron-containing phases. The electrochemical performance is markedly better in the case of Na2FePO4F-CNT (20 wt%), with specific capacities of about 100 mAh/g (Na2FePO4F-CNT) at C/4 rate vs. 50 mAh/g for Na2FePO4F-CB (20 wt%). SEM characterization of Na2FePO4F-CB particles revealed different particle morphologies for the Na2FePO4F-CNT and Na2FePO4F-CB powders. The carbon-poor surface observed for Na2FePO4F-CB could be due to a slow diffusion of carbon in the droplets during drying. On the contrary, Na2FePO4F-CNT shows a better CNT dispersion inside and at the surface of the NFPF particles that improves the electrochemical performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据