4.1 Article

ON TYPES OF SEXUAL MATURITY IN BRACHYURANS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SIZE AT THE ONSET OF SEXUAL MATURITY

期刊

JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 807-839

出版社

NATL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2983/035.036.0330

关键词

maturation; crab; brachyuran; morphometric maturity; physiological maturity; functional maturity

资金

  1. Malaysia's Ministry of Higher Education under Niche Research Grant Scheme (NRGS) [53131]
  2. STU Scientific Research Foundation for Talents [NTF17006]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals
  4. Sail Plan'' Program for the Introduction of Outstanding Talents of Guangdong Province, China [14600702]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sexual maturity is an important phase of brachyuran's life cycle as it marks the transition of becoming an adult and the ability to reproduce. This article discussed on the types of sexual maturity found in brachyurans and the implication and application of size at the onset of sexual maturity (SOM) in general. In addition, data on the estimates of SOM of brachyurans were collected on a global scale for the period 1971-2015. The 220 maturity data were representative of 133 brachyuran stocks from 23 families and 55 species. The effect of sampling methods and indicators used for the estimation of SOM were highlighted as well. Variation in the carapace width at which 50% of the population reaches maturity (CW50) was apparent between families, species, sexes, and populations within the same species, in addition to latitudinal and temporal variation. The CW50 was in a positive linear relationship with the maximum size (CWmax) for males (logCW(50) = -0.28 + 1.01logCW(max); R-2 = 0.85, P < 0.001), females ( logCW(50) = -0.35 + 1.08logCW(max); R-2 = 0.96, P < 0.001), and specifically Portunidae (logCW(50) = - 0.88 + 1.32logCW(max); R-2 = 0.69, P < 0.001). The size at maturity data in this review serve as guidelines for stock assessment and sustainable population management of brachyuran species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据