4.6 Article

The near-infrared spectroscopy-derived deoxygenated haemoglobin breaking-point is a repeatable measure that demarcates exercise intensity domains

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 873-877

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.237

关键词

Near-infrared spectroscopy; Respiratory compensation point; Ramp incremental test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: A breaking-point in the near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived deoxygenated haemoglobin (HHb) profile towards the end of a ramp incremental (RI) cycling test has been associated to the respiratory compensation point (RCP). Despite the physiological value of this measure, its repeatability remains unknown. The aim was to examine the repeatability of the [HHb] breaking-point ([HHb]BP) and its association to RCP during a RI cycling test. Design: A repeated measures design was performed on 11 males (30.5 +/- 8.4 year; 76.5 +/- 8.4 kg) and 4 females (30.5 +/- 5.9 year; 61.9 +/- 4.4 Kg). Methods: Gas exchange and NIRS [HHb] data were collected during RI tests performed on two different days separated by 48 h. The [HHb]BP and the RCP were determined and compared for each trial. Results: The [HHb]BP and the respiratory compensation point (RCP) occurred at the same VO2 in test 1 and test 2 ([HHb]BP: 3.49 +/- 0.52 L min(-1) test 1; 3.48 +/- 0.45 L min(-1) test 2; RCP: 3.38 +/- 0.40 L min(-1) test 1; 3.38 +/- 0.44 L min(-1) test 2) (P>0.05). The VO2 associated with the [HHb]BP and the VO2 at RCP were not significantly different from each other either in test 1 as well as in test 2 (P>0.05). Neither test 1 nor test 2 showed significant mean average error between the VO2 at the [HHb]BP RCP using Bland & Altman plots. Conclusions: The [HHb]BP is a repeatable measure that consistently occurs towards the end of a RI test. The association between the [HHb]BP and the RCP reinforces the idea that these parameters may share similar mechanistic basis. (C) 2017 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据