4.6 Article

Internal Heterostructure of Anion-Exchanged Cesium Lead Halide Nanocubes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 122, 期 25, 页码 13399-13406

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11118

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science & Technology (Government of India)
  2. CeNS, Bengaluru
  3. Science and Engineering Board (SERB) [SR/S2/RJN-61/2012]
  4. DST Nanomission Thematic Unit [SR/NM/TP-13/2016]
  5. IISER Pune
  6. UGC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-inorganic cesium lead halide (CsPbX3; X = Cl, Br, and I) perovskite nanocubes (NCs) exhibit fascinating optical and optoelectronic properties. Postsynthesis anion exchange by mixing NCs with reactive anion species has emerged as a unique strategy to control their composition and band gap. For example, we started with CsPbBr3 NCs with intense green emission, and then anion exchange with iodide ions yields CsPb(Br/I)(3) mixed halides and CsPbI3 with emission color systematically varying in the green-red region. However, the internal structure of the anion exchanged perovskite NCs is not probed. It is believed that the NCs possess a homogeneous alloyed composition, but X-ray diffraction pattern could not give evidence for such alloy formation, because the crystal structure also varies with anion composition. Here, we elucidate the internal heterostructure of anion-exchanged NCs using variable energy hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The results show that, in contrast to a homogeneous alloy, there is a significant inhomogeneity in the composition across the radius of NCs. The surface of CsPb(Br/I)(3) NCs is rich with exchanged iodide ions, whereas the core is rich with native bromide ions. Even CsPbI3 NCs obtained after assumed complete anion exchange show a small amount of bromide ions in the core. This finding of gradient internal heterostructure inside the anion-exchanged NCs will be important for future understanding of electronic properties and stability-related issues of CsPbX3 NCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据