4.6 Article

TiO2 Photonic Crystal Sensitized with Mn3O4 Nanoparticles and Porphine Manganese(III) as Efficient Photoanode for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 122, 期 1, 页码 260-266

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05985

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21373143]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  3. Project of Scientific and Technologic Infrastructure of Suzhou [SZS201708]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the synthesis and photoelectrochemical characterization of a novel composite consisting of Mn3O4 nanoparticles, porphine manganese(III) (PMA), and TiO2 photonic crystal (TPC). The prepared composite (Mn3O4/PMA/TPC) was used for fabricating the photoanode of a photoelectrochemical tandem cell. The obtained Mn3O4/PMA/TPC composite was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and UV vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). The results demonstrated that PMA and Mn3O4 nanoparticles had been loaded in the hole of TPC successfully. The photoelectrochemical characterization of the Mn3O4/PMA/TPC electrode revealed an enhanced light harvesting and effective electron hole separation. The photoelectrochemical tandem cell, of which Mn3O4/PMA/TPC electrode acted as a photoanode and a Pt plate as counter electrode, was used to evaluate the feasibility for water splitting to produce H-2 and O-2 under a 300 W solar simulator irradiation. The gases evolved from the system when the applied voltage was 1.0 V (vs RHE). The evolution amount of hydrogen and oxygen can reach to 12.2 mu mol and 4.4 mu mol, respectively, under 4 h simulated solar-light irradiation. The possible mechanism of the surface modification effects was proposed. The results suggest that Mn3O4 nanoparticles and PMA modified TPC can act as efficient catalyst for fabricating photoanode in a. photoelectrochemical tandem cell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据